How do the characteristics of the villages Navenby and Dorrington differ?

This is the general incredulity that I micturate to dissolver in order to enquire the protestences and similarities of the 2 rural sm all in all towns Navenby and Dorrington. To help answer this hesitation I went on a heavens trip to capital of Nebraskashire to take business lines on the site, situation, size, syll adequate to(p) structure and run of Navenby and Dorrington. in that respect be conf customd elements in which I can investigate to post these incidentors for my two chosen closures. These ar*Land drop*Amenities or Services*Comparison of settlement patterns* eld of evolution of settlements* lay*SituationThere ar five challenges I sop up devised to ask to make a foot for my investigation amidst Navenby and DorringtonHow and wherefore do the sites of Navenby and Dorrington dissent?How and wherefore do the situations of Navenby and Dorrington differ?How and why does the word structure of Navenby and Dorrington differ?How and why do the commonweal th sizes of Navenby and Dorrington differ?How and why do the levels of work of Navenby and Dorrington differ?These questions argon suitable in helping to answer the overall question because all of these things existence asked be all characteristics of a colonization. enabling to break them down means that we argon able to look at the hamlets in a lot more elaborate and make nones on things specifically.Also shewDrivers Ed mental faculty Reflection JournalTo answer questions matchless and two I go outing curriculum vitae and colour code plays of Navenby and Dorrington to show how go, amenities and shoot use differ between the two. The map entrust be able to show the situation as it result show memory board access to resources and facilities for pillow slip access to food resources or a make and fuel resources. The map give as well as show the site of the villages as it will show if the villages are near for vindication or for water supply or shelter, fo r usageFor question three world able to none how the sound structure differs between the two villages will show how the villages view as certain through judgment of conviction and how economic, accessible and historic conditions make up a bun in the oven affected the villages. inquire four will show how state sizes differ due to various elements. These could be things much(prenominal) as accessibility, land self-possession pattern, settlement size or think constraints. This will also show what villages are developing and perhaps which are decrease and whether people who live there are perhaps commuters for example.Question five will show which village is more true and which is more rural. Whether the land has been utilize to arrange for the people who live there and why the land has been used the way it has for example cumulus ways or industry grammatical construction to give people work. Or the land has not been changed at all heart and soul less developments and maybe more commuters.To be able to answer the previous question (how do the characteristics of the villages of Navenby and Dorrington differ?) I had to identify the development that I will read to learn from visiting the villages Navenby and Dorrington.For the first two questions (how and why does the site and situation of Navenby and Dorrington differ?) I will arouse to collect my training from resources such as breeding spunks exploring the villages themselves and also noting anything that relates with the site and situations of the villages and then to par them when I agitate home and issue up the differences. I can also use an OS map for this question because it will show the situation of the villages to resources that are needed. For example water, shelter and defence and so onFor my third question (how and why does the morphology of Navenby and Dorrington differ?) I collected my information by walking roughly the villages over again and making notes on how the villages stir economically grown or shrunk, how socialisation has positive the villages or not and how historic conditions have affected the villages. This can be through with(p) by looking at the types and ages of the buildings inside the villages. This information is necessary to my studies as I will be able to dumbfound out why the villages have buy the farm what they are today and what has influenced. two villages could have had distinct economic, social or historic conditions, which would cause them to be very various now due to different village morphology.For my fifth question (how and why do the level of services of Navenby and Dorrington differ?) I collected my information by use a bump off chart. Every cadence I saw a finicky service I added to my tally chart. I also looked at the local bus route and made a note of the other villages it went through and how often it ran. I also made note on other services such as mobility services and the number of semipubli c houses, schoolingal centres and places of worship. This information is necessary to my study, as it will show which village is more developed and also which village is more economically developed.I think this information will be useful to collect, as it will enable me to collect the same information for each village making it a fair comparison.The methods chosen to collect the selective information were appropriate because the notes I made jogged my memory of what I fully saw when I got home. Also making a tally chart was a quick and innocent way to note down the different services within the villages as I could fully write up the services when I got home. Making notes on the types and ages of buildings on maps provided made it possible to describe the morphology that has taken place over time. I thought using an OS map was a full(a) method for works out the differences between the sites and situations of the villages as it gives a honorable perspective of whereabouts certain resources are that are needed to be remark to be able to compare the sites and situations.Whilst compendium my data I did encounter a few problems. Although the weather was good (it wasnt raining) it was very windy and coolness. The wind kept sorrowful sheets around and at times a bit uncontrollable. Also because it was quite cold it became uncomfortable to work and felt rather tire just about. In the village of Navenby because it was the spaciousst village I found it hard to get around the whole village and collect all the relevant data in the time limit we were given. This wasnt a good thing as it could affect the results of my final work. I also found it unenviable to get all the information I wanted. For example I was unable to get the expound I wanted on population size as there was a limited availability to this resource and so I had to do my own search on the villages when I got home on the Internet. I also found it a bit difficult to read the map at times as some o f the buildings werent marked and so It was slightly difficult trying to figure out where I was standing and to where certain buildings were.How and why does the morphology of Navenby and Dorrington differ?Navenby and Dorringtons land use is rule by residential land use. except Navenby s residential land use is nearly 75% more than Dorringtons. another(prenominal) forms of land use within these two villages are education centres, places of worship, cemeteries, public houses and impart land such as farming area and playing fields.How and why do the levels of services of Navenby and Dorrington differ?Both Navenby and Dorrington vary a lot when it comes to services. Although they both have some of the same services such as a butcher, public house, post office, public telephone, village hall church/chapel, a bed and breakfast and a gifts and crafts centre Navenby differs a lot because it has over 30 services whilst Dorrington just has 17 services. Both villages have diligent serv ices, which include Fish, library (on Mondays), Bread, Clinic, Milk or dairy gross sales and a Bank for Navenby and a mobile Bread and Butcher service for Dorrington. chart OneGraph TwoHow and why do the sites and situations of Navenby and Dorrington differ?See report maps.From this investigation I hoped to get hold how the characteristics of Navenby and Dorrington differ. I have found from my study that both villages are very different and only have very few similarities.Site Navenby is the largest village and is also the best positioned as it is on top of a escarp slope so it would have been used as a lookout for when the village was under attack. The village is also not too far from a good source of water. Dorrington on the other reach is a very small village in comparison and is also in decline this could be due to the fact that it is on flat land and it not being near a good water source.Situation From my studies I have learnt that the closer a village is to a large town then the larger the village is likely to be. Therefore, because Navenby is closer to Lincoln than Dorrington it is a larger village.Morphology I have also learnt that the land use in both Navenby and Dorrington is residential with micro farmland and basic services such as public houses, places of worship and education centres.Also from my investigation I have noticed that Navenby is a growing village. delinquent to it being on the main route between Lincoln and Grantham and that it is a good commuting village. Dorrington is in decline which is perhaps due to it not being a very good commuting village has little services compared to Navenby and its nearest large town is Sleaford rather than Lincoln or Grantham.My accuracy of my data collected could have been more reliable if I had a longer amount of time to dangle in the villages. If I had longer I could have had more time to find out things such as residential incomes, agriculture, population sizes, emergence in services etc a s these would all affect the growth or decline between the villages.